Surveillance State Reading

by thefulllidvmg

Julian Sanchez gets in depth about the constitutional boundaries the USA has crossed with the expansion of the surveillance state.

Andrew Sullivan is disappointed in Barack Obama for not prosecuting the war criminals under our previous administration.

*Both of these reads are longer but rather interesting.

“If we are to recover as a nation under law rather under a prince, it will not be through the channels of the two major parties or through any president acceptable to the mainstream of either party. It will require a citizenry so enraged and protective of its core liberties against this security Leviathan that it compels dismantling this machinery and exposing it to the light of day – not recklessly, not abruptly, but by close examination, judicial review, press inquiry, protest. There are legitimate trade-offs between national security and liberty. But the protection of war criminals where no secrets are at stake except the scandal of torture itself is not one of them. Alas, there are few such citizens around. And, most tragic of all, those who say they care about liberty above all – the tea-partiers who invoke the founders – seem only too willing to surrender every liberty for the prize of a security against a threat we cannot even measure, and to bow down before a new king (and probably warrior-queen) rather than elect a new president.”

About these ads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: